Skip to content
OCCA Opinions
  • About
  • Files
  • OCCA Opinions
  • Wendell Hamilton

    1. Home>
    2. Files>
    3. Wendell Hamilton>

    F 2002-1259

    • Post author:Staff
    • Post published:November 7, 2003
    • Post category:F

    In OCCA case No. F 2002-1259, the appellant appealed his conviction for robbery in the first degree, robbery with imitation firearm, and possession of drug paraphernalia. In a published decision, the court decided to affirm the convictions but modified the sentences to run concurrently rather than consecutively. One judge dissented, stating that eleven life sentences shocked the court's conscience but eight did not.

    Continue ReadingF 2002-1259

    Categories

    • C
    • CF
    • D
    • F
    • HC
    • J
    • JS
    • M
    • MA
    • O
    • PC
    • PR
    • RE
    • S
    • SR

    Tags

    Abuse of Discretion Affirmed Appeal Appellant Appellate Review Appellee Concurrent Sentences Consecutive Sentences Constitutional Rights Conviction Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Appeals Cumulative Error Defense Counsel District Court Double Jeopardy Due Process Effective Assistance of Counsel Evidence Evidentiary Hearing Excessive sentence Fair Trial Guilty Plea Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Insufficient Evidence Judgment Judgment and Sentence Jurisdiction Life Imprisonment Mandate Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 11 Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 13.1 Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 701.8 Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 3.15 Oklahoma Oklahoma Constitution Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Plain Error Plea agreement Propositions of Error Prosecutorial Misconduct Sentencing State of Oklahoma Suspended Sentence Trial Court

    Recent Posts

    • SR-2022-250
    • RE-2021-1290
    • F-2018-790
    • F-2021-1220
    • C-2021-504
    Copyright - WordPress Theme by OceanWP