Skip to content
OCCA Opinions
  • About
  • Files
  • OCCA Opinions
  • Verbal Comments

    1. Home>
    2. Files>
    3. Verbal Comments>

    F 2002-101

    • Post author:Staff
    • Post published:January 23, 2003
    • Post category:F

    In OCCA case No. F 2002-101, Danny Joe Boomershine appealed his conviction for Forcible Sodomy and Rape by Instrumentation. In an unpublished decision, the court decided to affirm his convictions but modified the sentences to run concurrently instead of consecutively. One judge dissented, suggesting that the sentences should be modified to life.

    Continue ReadingF 2002-101

    Categories

    • C
    • CF
    • D
    • F
    • HC
    • J
    • JS
    • M
    • MA
    • O
    • PC
    • PR
    • RE
    • S
    • SR

    Tags

    Abuse of Discretion Affirmed Appeal Appellant Appellate Review Appellee Concurrent Sentences Consecutive Sentences Constitutional Rights Conviction Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Appeals Cumulative Error Defense Counsel District Court Double Jeopardy Due Process Effective Assistance of Counsel Evidence Evidentiary Hearing Excessive sentence Fair Trial Guilty Plea Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Insufficient Evidence Judgment Judgment and Sentence Jurisdiction Life Imprisonment Mandate Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 11 Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 13.1 Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 701.8 Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 3.15 Oklahoma Oklahoma Constitution Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Plain Error Plea agreement Propositions of Error Prosecutorial Misconduct Sentencing State of Oklahoma Suspended Sentence Trial Court

    Recent Posts

    • SR-2022-250
    • RE-2021-1290
    • F-2018-790
    • F-2021-1220
    • C-2021-504
    Copyright - WordPress Theme by OceanWP