Skip to content
OCCA Opinions
  • About
  • Files
  • OCCA Opinions
  • Proof of Finality

    1. Home>
    2. Files>
    3. Proof of Finality>

    RE 2012-0259

    • Post author:Staff
    • Post published:June 4, 2013
    • Post category:RE

    In OCCA case No. RE 2012-0259, the appellant, Samuel David Murich, appealed his conviction for possession of a controlled dangerous substance. In a published decision, the court decided that the revocation of Murich's suspended sentences was not valid because the State did not prove the finality of the conviction it used to revoke his probation. The court agreed with Murich’s argument and reversed the revocation. One judge dissented.

    Continue ReadingRE 2012-0259

    Categories

    • C
    • CF
    • D
    • F
    • HC
    • J
    • JS
    • M
    • MA
    • O
    • PC
    • PR
    • RE
    • S
    • SR

    Tags

    Abuse of Discretion Affirmed Appeal Appellant Appellate Review Appellee Concurrent Sentences Consecutive Sentences Constitutional Rights Conviction Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Appeals Cumulative Error Defense Counsel District Court Double Jeopardy Due Process Effective Assistance of Counsel Evidence Evidentiary Hearing Excessive sentence Fair Trial Guilty Plea Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Insufficient Evidence Judgment Judgment and Sentence Jurisdiction Life Imprisonment Mandate Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 11 Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 13.1 Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 701.8 Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 3.15 Oklahoma Oklahoma Constitution Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Plain Error Plea agreement Propositions of Error Prosecutorial Misconduct Sentencing State of Oklahoma Suspended Sentence Trial Court

    Recent Posts

    • SR-2022-250
    • RE-2021-1290
    • F-2018-790
    • F-2021-1220
    • C-2021-504
    Copyright - WordPress Theme by OceanWP