Skip to content
OCCA Opinions
  • About
  • Files
  • OCCA Opinions
  • Anderson v. State

    1. Home>
    2. Files>
    3. Anderson v. State>

    F-2005-1057

    • Post author:Staff
    • Post published:July 1, 2006
    • Post category:F

    In OCCA case No. F-2005-1057, Saul Mintz appealed his conviction for two counts of Robbery with a Firearm. In a published decision, the court decided that while his conviction was affirmed, his sentence for the second count should be modified to ten years' imprisonment. One judge dissented.

    Continue ReadingF-2005-1057

    Categories

    • C
    • CF
    • D
    • F
    • HC
    • J
    • JS
    • M
    • MA
    • O
    • PC
    • PR
    • RE
    • S
    • SR

    Tags

    Abuse of Discretion Affirmed Appeal Appellant Appellate Review Appellee Concurrent Sentences Consecutive Sentences Constitutional Rights Conviction Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Appeals Cumulative Error Defense Counsel District Court Double Jeopardy Due Process Effective Assistance of Counsel Evidence Evidentiary Hearing Excessive sentence Fair Trial Guilty Plea Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Insufficient Evidence Judgment Judgment and Sentence Jurisdiction Life Imprisonment Mandate Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 11 Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 13.1 Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 701.8 Okla. Stat. tit. 22 § 3.15 Oklahoma Oklahoma Constitution Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Plain Error Plea agreement Propositions of Error Prosecutorial Misconduct Sentencing State of Oklahoma Suspended Sentence Trial Court

    Recent Posts

    • SR-2022-250
    • RE-2021-1290
    • F-2018-790
    • F-2021-1220
    • C-2021-504
    Copyright - WordPress Theme by OceanWP